Tuesday, 17 May 2016

The money hiding industry in NZ




I wrote a letter to the Editor, it has yet to be published, and based on past behaviour may not be:
Editor
MSL
Dear Sir,
The PM has stated that he knows nothing about the Cook Islands tax haven set up. Can your newspaper confirm the following?
Prior to becoming PM key was director in these companies
Deutsche Pacific formerly Bankers Trust based in Cook Islands for tax purposes
Deutsche Futures formerly Bankers Trust Futures
Deutsche Financial formerly Bankers Trust Financial
Deutsche Corporate Finance formerly Bankers Trust Finance
Deutsche Services formerly Bankers Trust Services
After Key became PM: He paid back Deutsche back with interest:
The Treasury appointed Deutsche Bank as the Crown's Financial Advisor for
preparatory work it is doing to extend the mixed ownership model to four State Owned Enterprises.
Treasury's General Manager John Crawford said: "We are pleased to be working with Deutsche Bank and Craig’s Investment
Partners who were selected after a rigorous assessment process from a strong line up of credible candidates."
A strong line of credible candidates… yeah right
Peter Wheeler
Now back in 2013 a Nicky Hager investigative report was published: The reference below takes you to that report:


I have repeated only a part of this report below to simply show how bad things were in NZ at the time that NZ turned into a willing Tax Haven via the then Cook Islands…and remember Key has said “I know nothing about the Cook Islands”…

The TrustNet leaks show New Zealanders in key roles helping to run the system. TrustNet markets itself today as the largest independent offshore services company in Asia. It was set up 25 years ago by Kiwis in what was then the newly established Cook Islands tax haven.
In the early 1980s business lobbyists from New Zealand and Australia persuaded the Cook Islands government that becoming a tax haven would bring riches to the small island group. These lobbyists included New Zealander lawyer Trevor Clarke, "father of the Cook Islands tax haven", who with others used the new tax haven laws to build a company called European Pacific.
Documents about European Pacific's tax schemes were leaked and tabled in the New Zealand Parliament by MP Winston Peters, igniting the Winebox scandal (see breakout).
Another key figure was New Zealand lawyer Mike Mitchell, the Cook Islands solicitor-general in the early 1980s and main government adviser as the tax haven was established. He resigned from that role in 1986 to move into the offshore business himself. On April 29, 1987, he established an offshore services company called Pacific Trustee Company. The company was later renamed TrustNet, the company at the centre of last week's leaks.
TrustNet's first chief executive was another New Zealand lawyer, Steve Breed, who was joined a few years later by fellow Auckland law school graduate David Sceats. Early staff included people who'd worked on the Cook Islands Winebox schemes. The European Pacific tax expert accused in court of leaking the Winebox documents, New Zealand lawyer George Couttie, had moved on to work for TrustNet in Hong Kong. But soon after this accusation was made, according to internal documents, senior TrustNet staff recorded a terse company resolution that "accepted" his resignation "effective from the date hereof".
In contrast, European Pacific's former senior executive Geoff Barry was later hired by TrustNet and rose to become the chief executive officer. Today, 10 years later, he is executive director of TrustNet's Hong Kong office.
Spencer's ownership of TrustNet was never publicised. It came to light only during analysis of the leaked records. A note about an obscure offshore entity says "Client is our big boss, John Spencer".
Spencer, who had inherited his family's Caxton toilet paper empire, owned, with his family, a majority share of TrustNet from July 1990 until September 2004, through a Bahamas company called International Trustee Holding Company Limited. John and Berridge Spencer also used TrustNet to place some of their own money and investments in a complex web of offshore companies and trusts. These were based in the British Virgin Islands and Cook Islands, with names such as Northern Lights Trust, Star One Trust and Tristar Capital Service Limited. A spokesperson for the Spencer family said neither John nor Berridge Spencer have been New Zealand residents since the 1990s and in those circumstances it was hardly surprising that the family have assets invested outside of New Zealand.
With the Spencers' backing TrustNet grew quickly, opening offices in Hong Kong in 1991, the British Virgin Islands in 1993 and Singapore in 1994. The early clients included a controversial Indonesian rainforest logging tycoon named Prajogo Pangestu, who had four British Virgin Islands companies.

TREVOR CLARKE

Another TrustNet client was the former European Pacific manager Trevor Clarke. He had his own set of offshore companies and trusts administered by TrustNet. They were home to millions of dollars of assets, the leaked documents reveal, and TrustNet staff was given special instructions about keeping them secret. One document reads: "We are to contact Trevor by phone only unless otherwise instructed . . . No documents are to be kept here. All docs are to be held in our Hong Kong office."

Clarke was appointed chair of the Cook Islands' new Financial Supervisory Commission from 2003 until 2010, which was set up to oversee the offshore industry. Throughout those years he had the secretive offshore trusts and companies. Clarke responded that he was not "a user of any Cook Islands entities" - his companies and trusts were in Samoa and the British Virgin Islands - and said these were set up well before his role as FSC chair. He had disclosed them to a number of authorities. He said there were lots of reasons for people to want to have assets outside the country where they live. The secrecy instructions did not come from him, he said.

The TrustNet files also show a close relationship between the company and the BNZ and ANZ banks, which had dedicated staff for offshore banking. The leaked documents show bank staff routinely helping TrustNet move money in and out of its clients' offshore bank accounts held at the BNZ Singapore branch and ANZ Cook Islands branch.
In September 2004, the Spencers sold TrustNet to a Singaporean offshore lawyer named David Chong. But many of the New Zealanders, especially lawyers, continued to work in the company and be part of tax haven politics.
Lawyers created the offshore world and lawyers and accountants run it. They lobby in each tax haven for special laws to attract clients and often actually write the laws themselves. The leaked TrustNet papers show this clearly in the minutes of the Cook Islands Trust Company Association.
The offshore services company heads are seen sitting around deciding what laws they want, putting the hat around for money to have them drafted and then arranging to present the new laws to the Cook Islands government. The same lawyers then use these laws to help their clients. 

They also deal with the problems when things go wrong. One of their New Zealand lawyers Penny Purcell was on duty, for instance, when two officers from the Hong Kong Commercial Crime Bureau turned up on August 20, 2007, at TrustNet’s harbour-front offices. They were investigating a fraud case involving a British Virgin Islands company called Sound Financial Management Limited. 

The secret TrustNet files include Purcell’s written record of the meeting. Detective Sergeant Steven Lam produced a formal letter from the Hong Kong commissioner of police requesting ‘‘all relevant documents’’ about Sound Financial Management Limited and details of the company’s director and shareholder. Purcell replied that the officers would need to contact TrustNet’s British Virgin Islands office and, according to her own notes, assured them ‘‘we do not keep any files or records here’’. 
She said the police ‘‘were surprised’’ the office had no records and asked how this could be ‘‘if the client is based here in Hong Kong’’. ‘‘I then explained,’’ Purcell wrote, ‘‘that we acted as a marketing/secretarial office but that all information including the registers of the Company were kept in its registered office.’’ 

Detective Sergeant Lam tried one last time, she wrote, asking if they kept any information there in Hong Kong, including correspondence. ‘‘I said no,’’ Purcell wrote. A few days later TrustNet repeated the denial by letter. ‘‘Portcullis TrustNet (Hong Kong) Limited does not hold any corporate or statutory records of the Company, nor is it required to,’’ the letter said. However, the details the police were looking for would have been instantly available on Portcullis computer. The leaked TrustNet documents show that she routinely used the company’s Offshore Management Information System (OMIS), which was available in all the TrustNet offices and contained all the client records. 

The OMIS database, which was leaked to ICIJ, lists Sound Financial Management’s director and shareholder as Glen Douglas Crankshaw, a Canadian living near Bangkok. TrustNet helped his company open a bank account at the Standard Chartered Bank, Hong Kong branch, located on the ground floor of the same building as TrustNet. According to Purcell’s notes, she told them none of this. Two years later the Hong Kong police issued an arrest warrant for Crankshaw for ‘‘dealing with property known or reasonably believed to represent the proceeds of indictable crime’’. They had traced him through a different offshore company, with the similar name ‘‘GS Sound Management Limited’’.

Purcell has since returned to help run TrustNet’s office on Auckland’s North Shore. She remains part of a network of New Zealand offshore lawyers scattered in tax havens around the world. They include former TrustNet lawyer Barry Mitchell who, according to court documents, gave assistance during the setting up of the Trinity investment scheme, New Zealand’s largest tax avoidance case; and Act Party-aligned blogger Cathy Odgers (‘‘Cactus Kate’’) who has worked as an offshore lawyer in the British Virgin Islands and Hong Kong. 
Various offshore lawyers have brought their skills home, taking advantage of New Zealand’s loose company and trust law.

The original TrustNet lawyers, Breed and Sceats, came home and set up Nexus Trust, promoting New Zealand’s tax haven potential to foreign clients. Two other former Cook Island lawyers, Nick Shepherd and (former European Pacific executive) Mike Reynolds set up Anchor Trustees which offers services to ‘‘non-resident families and corporates’’. 

Long-term TrustNet client Tim Brears on Auckland’s North Shore offers clients advice on the ‘‘advantages of moving ownership and control of assets and investment offshore out of New Zealand’’.  

Nicky Hager has worked in a multi-country team for the past 15 months analysing the leaked materials and co-ordinating local journalists in Asia, Africa and part of Europe who collaborated in the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists project, www.icij.org.
- Sunday Star Times

It should be noted that Act Party-aligned blogger Cathy Odgers (‘‘Cactus Kate’’) who has worked as an offshore lawyer in the British Virgin Islands and Hong Kong. Is the same person who said if given Nicky Hager,s address she would pass it on to shady Chinese business people…both Cameron Slater [Whaleoil] and Mathew Hooten supplied Hager address. So much for honesty amongst thieves…  

Thursday, 12 May 2016

Engaging in corrupt behaviour.



What is the main lesson to come out of the information revealed to us via the Panama papers?
“Many in the New Zealand mainstream media have been wondering, why the fuss if New Zealand laws facilitate rich foreigners to avoid their fiscal obligations in their own countries. Why is that our concern, they ask? - See more at: http://thedailyblog.co.nz/2016/05/12/must-read-mossack-fonseca-and-global-tax-avoidance-economist-keith-rankin/#sthash.F4Jtv2U3.dpuf
Keith Rankin went on to say, “Non-payment of taxes by the rich is severely detrimental to the global economy. New Zealand is a part of the global economy, so international tax-avoidance detriments us. If we encourage others to legally cheat on ‘their own’ people, and encourage our people to help them cheat on their people, then the global market system fails (or, at minimum, becomes inefficient and unstable). When systemic failure happens, we all stand to lose: the aiders and abettors, the innocent bystanders who pay their taxes but also look the other way, and the billions of foreign victims whom too many of us care too little about. –
I believe we owe it to our fellow human beings that if we see people ripping off their populations then we should not facilitate that behaviour. I’m sure that where ever the money comes from the local people, the working men and women have to pay more for their services or whatever. These tax dodges are stealing from the State, in the US it is considered that over a trillion dollars is lost to the state because of tax avoidance.
When confronted with the evidence that NZ is facilitating the misuse of our overseas trust processes we saw the angry and typical male bully behaviour from our PM. This is what The Daily Blog said on the subject:
“Offensive, abusive and needlessly antagonistic, the boorish behaviour of Key in Parliament is a disgrace. His screaming at the Opposition last year that they were on the side of rapists and murderers was topped yesterday as he lashed out at Amnesty International, Greenpeace, Red Cross and the very kind Mojo Mathers to distract from the increasing heat he is facing over aiding and abetting the creation of a Tax Haven here. - This isn’t left or right, it isn’t boorish grand standing that’s required, we need real leadership to crack down on these vested interests. - See more at: http://thedailyblog.co.nz/2016/05/12/keys-parliamentary-tantrum/#sthash.2ihThOBP.dpuf

The divide between the rich and the poor over this subject is huge. The poor pay tax on the first dollar earned and GST on anything else they buy. Whereas the super-rich or very well off believe they are taxed too much and use others to create tax avoidance schemes for them. And our government helps them achieve that goal especially the mega rich based outside of New Zealand. Frank Macskasy wrote:
There is a preternatural volcanic fury from the Right – many, if not most, of whom view taxation as “theft” and tax-havens as a legitimate counter to governments who cheekily demand tax from its citizens and corporates.
The same Right believe that taxation is “wasted” on “frivolous” matters such as public health, public education, welfare, environmental protection, housing the poor, etc. Only funding for Police and the Armed Forces is considered justified to protect their hoarded wealth from increasingly poor, frustrated, and angry workers. - See more at: http://thedailyblog.co.nz/2016/05/11/panama-papers-matthew-hootons-alternate-universes-on-twitter-and-radio-nz/#sthash.IHxAcZHb.dpuf

This from Australia:
Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull has been named in the Panama Papers:
The Australian Financial Review reported that in the 1990s the Prime Minister and former NSW Premier Neville Wran were on the board of Star Mining NL and its subsidiary in the British Virgin Islands, Star Technology Service, which had been incorporated by Mossack Fonseca two years earlier.
Star Mining is an Australian listed company which hoped to develop a $20 billion Siberian gold mine called Sukhoi Log.

In response to allegations Star Technologies had made donations to Russian politicians, Mr Turnbull's spokesman said the Prime Minister was not aware of any such donations in the time before or after he was a director.
The newspaper reports stress that there's no suggestion of impropriety on Turnbull's part. At the same time, it leaves him tainted. It is one thing to be "in business" but quite another to be in business via a tax haven with a company alleged to have engaged in corrupt behaviour.
One last item from the No Right Turn blog:


So far the tally of New Zealanders caught up in the Panama Papers is thin - as you'd expect. Culturally, ultra-rich kiwis are hardly likely to go to Panama for their tax-dodging needs. Instead, they'd go to London, Sydney, or just Auckland. But there has been one interesting catch:
Deborah Pead is well known in the Auckland PR scene and became the benefactor of a trust for a sick friend, which unwittingly landed her in the files of Mossack Fonseca.
In 2014 she enlisted the help of Chesterfield, a financial management company, to help take care of her friend's money.
Chesterfield in turn asked Mossack Fonseca to set up three trusts in the blacklisted British Virgin Islands.
Documents show when the companies were established using "business profits" they had a total value of $220,000.
Ms Pead told ‘ONE’ News she had no idea Mossack Fonseca was involved or how the law firm structured finances.
Riiigghhhtt, this sounds... implausible. In fact, about as credible as "the dog ate my homework" or "the money was just resting in my account".
But stranger things have happened. Maybe Pead really does have a wealthy sick friend, who magically entrusted her with hundreds of thousands of dollars of (perfectly legitimately obtained and surely properly taxed) "business profits". And maybe the financial management company went to a lot of expensive effort setting up multiple trusts in the Bahamas for that money because that's what they always do for their clients, even for those with relatively small (in a financial management sense) amounts of money who have expressed no desire for such structures (such diligence!). Maybe it is all just a terrible, suspicious and implausible-looking series of events with a perfectly reasonable, legitimate explanation. Surely the word of a PR consultant - a polite euphemism for "paid liar" - is enough for us to believe that.

The real question, I guess, is whether it’s enough for the IRD.

Monday, 9 May 2016

Are they all Leftwing conspircy theorists




Photo: (L-R) Patrick O'Meara, Lee Taylor, Jessica Mutch, Gyles Beckford, Jane Patterson, Andrea Vance and Nicky Hager. Photo: RNZ / Jeremy Brick

All these journalists are according to the Prime Minister ‘Left-wing’ conspiracy theorists working to bring down the government; all are controlled by the Far-left, Labour Party, Green Party and New Zealand First. Plus it would seem you can put the Maori Party and even Peter Dunne…into the same camp, it would seem that only David Seymour supports the Nats...what else can he do?
If a vote was held on banning overseas trust funds it would be successful so long as Peter Dunne showed some courage and was prepared to stand tall.

1. This report from Radio New Zealand explains how the above journalists came together to analyse and explain the real meaning of the Panama documents…   

Two weeks after RNZ, One News and Nicky Hager joined forces to tackle the Panama Papers; Alex van Wel looks back at how and why the collaboration came about.
RNZ and TVNZ aren't natural bed-fellows.

We at RNZ float in a delightfully non-commercial world, guided by our Charter's public interest. Audience size is critical to us, of course, but we sometimes pretend it isn't. TVNZ, on the other hand, openly fights it out in the battle for ratings.

The question is whether we turn it to our advantage, or hold onto old ways.
Digging into the Panama Papers - Click here for full Panama Papers NZ coverage
Still, the notion of a partnership with TV came as a shock to many RNZers.
More than anything, they asked why?
But it took the journalists - the only ones in New Zealand with access to all the documents that make up the Panama Papers - only seconds to realise the benefits of collaboration, of sharing our knowledge, our expertise, and our ideas.
They saw the answer in a flash: none of us are better than all of us.
We agreed in our first joint meeting to be open about our work and to publish or broadcast our findings simultaneously.Instead of racing each other to a half-baked headline, we'd give the story the time and thought it deserved.
Even the most hardened amongst us was surprised by this spontaneous meeting of minds.
"Wow. That was good," investigative journalist Nicky Hager emailed me after the first meeting. Nicky, TVNZ's Editor News gathering Phil O'Sullivan and I quickly put down a few simple ground rules and unleashed the hounds.
Lists of names and companies to investigate were shared immediately, emails spun around with leads, lines of enquiry and ideas on how to divide up the work.
But access was a problem and training had to be done via a dodgy video link to Latin America.

Then the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) announced it was making some of the Panama Papers data public today - 9 May, putting the pressure on us to come up with something quickly.

Three RNZers, three TVNZers and Nicky got together in a small, stuffy room in RNZ's Wellington office, and started digging.
Methodical checking in a database of over 11 million documents takes patience, organisation and persistence. I dropped in from time to time to assess the mood.
There was a bit of hesitancy at first, as the team got used to this new world of collaboration, but within a few hours any nosy editors entering the room were roundly ignored.
Intense discussion over this lead, that company, this trust, that fund, absorbed them.
Chocolate, popcorn, and other gluten-laden treats littered the desk, reporter debris was everywhere.
The focus was the story: TVNZ and RNZ divisions evaporated.
There wasn't much sleep, but the enthusiasm was clear.
"I love it," said RNZ's political editor Jane Patterson at the end of a 12-hour day last Monday.
By Wednesday a coverage plan had materialised, with 6am yesterday set as our target for story one. To read the full report, go to:
2. To hear how the Prime Minister reacted to the Panama papers question listen to Q1 from Andrew Little, and Q2 from James Shaw…Q4 from NZF Ron Mark these three questions reveal a PM in complete denial mode. His attack on deaf Green MP Mojo Mathers was absolutely the sign of a twisted and bitter man…who seems to love attacking innocent females.